Canon 24-70mm Lens
Reddit take
AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote
The Canon 24-70mm is widely considered a professional workhorse, frequently described as a 'moneymaker' for wedding and event photographers due to its versatility and sharpness. While it is a staple 'glued' to many cameras, there are significant recurring reports regarding long-term mechanical durability, particularly concerning internal wear and ribbon cable failures.
Pros
- Professional-level image quality and sharpness across the entire frame
- Highly versatile focal range suitable for travel, weddings, and everyday use
- Reliable performance for professional income-generating work
- Excellent wide-end performance for a standard zoom
Cons
- Internal ribbon cables are prone to breaking from zooming, which can lock the aperture at f/2.8
- Plastic bushings on zoom pins can shred over time, leading to a loss of sharpness
- Mechanical repairs for internal failures are often costly and sometimes deemed not worth the expense
- Some users find the lens lacks 'character' or is 'uninteresting' compared to primes
Caveats
- Older or heavily used units may suffer from 'looseness' or softness due to internal mechanical wear
- Reports of 'dud' units that lack the expected professional sharpness
- The lens is susceptible to internal fungus if not stored properly
Best for
- Wedding and event photographers who need a versatile, reliable zoom
- Travelers looking for a high-quality single-lens solution
- Professional shooters requiring prime-like quality in a zoom format
Avoid if
- You are purchasing a heavily used older unit without a mechanical inspection
- You prioritize unique lens character over clinical utility
- You are concerned about high out-of-warranty repair costs for mechanical components
This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 6-month half-life. The evidence is older (median age ~403 days), and users should note that Reddit discussions often blend experiences across different generations (EF vs. RF) of this lens.
Sentiment
11 positive (65%) · 4 mixed (24%) · 2 negative (12%)
Trust + time weighted score: +50% · raw score 53%
What redditors said (10 of 17)
Sad, but true. That was my first L lens, and it was practically welded to my camera, but I always wondered if I got a dud. I thought I was doing something wrong not getting super sharp images. Then the looseness came along, and it sadly died from fungus inside. That being said, I really liked it on (originally) my Canon Elan IIe film SLR and then my 20D.
to my surprise it turned out vast majority of them were taken on the wide end of my 24-70.
It was my most used lens before I got my R5 with 24-70.
That’s before getting into zoom lenses like the 24-70 and 70-200 2.8L or third party EF lenses.
I bought two bodies, one with a fast 24-70 or 24-120 equivalent, and another with a fast 70-200 equivalent.
The 24-70 is an excellent lens. It is sharp across the entire image and will serve excellently as a standard zoom lens. If you do make an income from photography, the 24-70 won’t disappoint.
You already have 17-50 covered so 24-70 won’t give you much more (it’s sharper than the 17-40 though).
I would personally look for a used 24-70 either on KEH or MPB.
The 24-70 is a very good lens (I have one for everyday photography) but it isn’t an interesting lens.
when I was shooting weddings and other events I used my 24-70 about 10x more than my prime.
Compare
Canon 24-70mm Lens vs Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMCanon 24-70mm Lens vs Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USMCanon 24-70mm Lens vs Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Related
- 24-70 2.8 · variant · 11 mentions
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions
- Canon EOS R10 · related · 453 mentions