UV filter
Reddit take
Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.
Pros
- My advice is to always get a UV filter and put it on each new lens right out of the box. I’d rather replace a scratched $80 filter instead of a $300 front element
- When I started photography, I put UV filters on all my lenses because at that point I wasn't yet secure enough in my belief that I would be able to treat my lenses safely. It was the difference between going out and shooting with slightl...
- However in scenarios such as yours or beaches or anything where small particles can scratch the lens I'd say they're worth it. But definitely don't cheap out.
- It brings me peace of mind. I've been a photographer semi and now pro for 15 years now, i've only let my camera (I've had a few) fall twice and I count by the hands the knocks and hits. But I've seen countless uv getting scratched by god...
Cons
- I think UV filters are a waste of time, but if it brings you peace of mind in the field, that's invaluable.
- I shot last year and protected my gear but had to throw out the UV filter when I was done because that shit was now one with the filter.
- I’m in the camp that it can degrade an image if it’s cheep or the circumstance is right, however I don’t buy the super cheep ones and I always use a hood so I’ve never had the reflection type problems.
- UV filters only make your pictures worse. They trap condensation and can cause glare.
- In modern lenses, it has 0 optical usage. In fact I could encourage reflections when it attracts dirt and oils. Also.it could also not be fully optically clear.
Sentiment
4 positive (36%) · 1 mixed (9%) · 6 negative (55%)
Trust + time weighted score: -27% · raw score -18%
What redditors said (10 of 11)
I think UV filters are a waste of time, but if it brings you peace of mind in the field, that's invaluable.
I shot last year and protected my gear but had to throw out the UV filter when I was done because that shit was now one with the filter.
I’m in the camp that it can degrade an image if it’s cheep or the circumstance is right, however I don’t buy the super cheep ones and I always use a hood so I’ve never had the reflection type problems.
UV filters only make your pictures worse. They trap condensation and can cause glare.
In modern lenses, it has 0 optical usage. In fact I could encourage reflections when it attracts dirt and oils. Also.it could also not be fully optically clear.
My advice is to always get a UV filter and put it on each new lens right out of the box. I’d rather replace a scratched $80 filter instead of a $300 front element
When I started photography, I put UV filters on all my lenses because at that point I wasn't yet secure enough in my belief that I would be able to treat my lenses safely. It was the difference between going out and shooting with slightly degraded glass versus not going out and shooting at all.
However in scenarios such as yours or beaches or anything where small particles can scratch the lens I'd say they're worth it. But definitely don't cheap out.
It brings me peace of mind. I've been a photographer semi and now pro for 15 years now, i've only let my camera (I've had a few) fall twice and I count by the hands the knocks and hits. But I've seen countless uv getting scratched by god knows why. Liquids, dust, sand whatever... I sacrifice 2% of my photo quality for the peace of mind
I don’t like the idea of paying thousands of dollars for a lens and then shooting through a cheap piece of glass. That can definitely degrade image quality.
Compare
Related
- iPhone · related · 1,520 mentions
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 1,275 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 1,252 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 1,188 mentions
- R6ii · related · 902 mentions
- Canon EOS R10 · related · 843 mentions