trustmebro.reviews

Sigma (PS5 converter)

Software Tool · Camera lenses · 13 mentions · 5 subreddits · discussed in r/canon, r/cycling, r/Guitar, r/photography

Reddit take

Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.

Pros

  • The only thing I would check is if it has a solid top, but I'm pretty sure that Sigma doesn't even produce laminate-top guitars.
  • Garmin are market leaders but wahoo, hammerhead, coros, sigma, etc are viable alternatives.
  • Parent context: Thanks. The Sigma had a much better aperture than the kit lenses, and I wanted to try also astrophotography on that trip, the kit (18-45mm f4.5-6.3) could not handle that low light situations. Reply: The Sigma had a much...
  • The sigma looks awesome but i can not get it because of the budget .
  • I have since picked up 2 sigma apsc lens that are alot better. Consider getting sigma instead. It is next level.

Cons

  • Don't buy the sigma. It pulses on rf mount some. It also weighs more than 100-400 and 800 combined

Sentiment

12 positive (92%) · 0 mixed (0%) · 1 negative (8%)

Trust + time weighted score: +79% · raw score 85%

What redditors said (10 of 13)

Don't buy the sigma. It pulses on rf mount some. It also weighs more than 100-400 and 800 combined
negative · u/T****s · r/canon · comment · Dec 30, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
The only thing I would check is if it has a solid top, but I'm pretty sure that Sigma doesn't even produce laminate-top guitars.
positive · u/T****s · r/Guitar · comment · Dec 20, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Garmin are market leaders but wahoo, hammerhead, coros, sigma, etc are viable alternatives.
positive · u/C****d · r/cycling · comment · Dec 18, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Parent context: Thanks. The Sigma had a much better aperture than the kit lenses, and I wanted to try also astrophotography on that trip, the kit (18-45mm f4.5-6.3) could not handle that low light situations. Reply: The Sigma had a much better aperture than the kit lenses, and I wanted to try also astrophotography on that trip, the kit (18-45mm f4.5-6.3) could not handle that low light situations.
positive · u/R****7 · r/canon · comment · Nov 25, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
The sigma looks awesome but i can not get it because of the budget .
positive · u/l****u · r/canon · comment · Aug 30, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I have since picked up 2 sigma apsc lens that are alot better. Consider getting sigma instead. It is next level.
positive · u/b****l · r/canon · comment · Aug 9, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
As far as EF I would take the sigma toe to toe with the canon. It’s definitely bulkier, but I would argue the build quality is a leg or two up, and the sharpness wide open (or near it) is better than the canon.
positive · u/T****s · r/canon · comment · Jul 17, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
i love the lens, actually love pretty much anything sigma offers
positive · u/F****4 · r/canon · comment · Feb 27, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
If anything I would avoid using any third party options besides maybe the sigma or Samyang offerings (if I could find a good deal second-hand).
positive · u/H****x · r/canon · comment · Feb 11, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I’ve got a Sigma and it performs very well at f8 600.
positive · u/G****a · r/canon · comment · Feb 7, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗

Compare

Related