Sigma 16-300mm
Reddit take
Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.
Pros
- Need a lot of reach and hate changing lenses; Sigma 16-300 or the new Tamron 18-300.
- There are a lot of good crop lenses starting to appear for the system now, including a Sigma (and Tamron) 16-300 which are both better than the older Tamron.
- Been looking at the sigma 16-300 as an amateur do-it-all lens for outdoor shooting ( mostly nature and motorsports). Not cheap, but I have heard good things.
Cons
- I used the Sigma 16-300 on the R7 (again, it isn't really suitable for the R8 as it's a crop lens) and I found it a bit soft, but it's certainly versatile.
- If you need All in one kind of a lens then think about Sigma 16-300 kind of superzoom. But note that 100-400 will be sharper and better optically than the sigma.
- Sigma does have the super zoom 16-300 in RF. Have not read any reviews. It is a one lens solution with all the potential for the typical one lens compromises.
- Something like the Sigma 16-300 perhaps?
- Though I did sell it recently because I'd love to get the Sigma 16-300 for traveling.
Sentiment
3 positive (27%) · 8 mixed (73%) · 0 negative (0%)
Trust + time weighted score: +28% · raw score 27%
What redditors said (10 of 11)
Need a lot of reach and hate changing lenses; Sigma 16-300 or the new Tamron 18-300.
I used the Sigma 16-300 on the R7 (again, it isn't really suitable for the R8 as it's a crop lens) and I found it a bit soft, but it's certainly versatile.
If you need All in one kind of a lens then think about Sigma 16-300 kind of superzoom. But note that 100-400 will be sharper and better optically than the sigma.
Sigma does have the super zoom 16-300 in RF. Have not read any reviews. It is a one lens solution with all the potential for the typical one lens compromises.
Something like the Sigma 16-300 perhaps?
There are a lot of good crop lenses starting to appear for the system now, including a Sigma (and Tamron) 16-300 which are both better than the older Tamron.
Though I did sell it recently because I'd love to get the Sigma 16-300 for traveling.
Been looking at the sigma 16-300 as an amateur do-it-all lens for outdoor shooting ( mostly nature and motorsports). Not cheap, but I have heard good things.
Sigma 16-300 is does both but it’s not the best
Sigma 16-300; big and heavy, probably a bit TOO versatile
Compare
Sigma 16-300mm vs Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMSigma 16-300mm vs Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USMSigma 16-300mm vs Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Related
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions
- Canon EOS R10 · related · 453 mentions