trustmebro.reviews

Garmin Forerunner 265

Physical Product · Smartwatches & fitness trackers · 116 mentions · 3 subreddits · discussed in r/Garmin, r/AppleWatch, r/cycling

Reddit take

Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.

Pros

  • I would recommend the 265. It is on sale at Amazon for $299 vs the 165 which is $199 ($249 for the music version). 265 vs 165 gets you: * **Dual-band GPS** → more accurate in cities, woods, tall buildings * **Better heart-rate sensor**...
  • I had the same hesitation as you, I ended up buying the 265. I use the touchscreen feature more often than I expected.
  • I have the 265, and I love it.
  • The bright display of the 265 and the rly good resolution is the biggest difference. ... If you dont have to worry about money, I'd take the 265, its great.
  • Forerunner 265 might be a good entry level. At least it was for me

Cons

  • I came from an MIP 645 Music, I've turned the touchscreen off on my 265.
  • I have a 265, I came from a 645 Music. - You're spot on about the Training Readiness, it's alright but nothing amazing. - I enjoy the AMOLED, but I was good with MIP too.
  • I'd suggest looking at the Forerunner 255, 265 and 570 and the 955 through 970; at the Instinct 2 and 3, and at the Fenix 7 if price is an object.
  • Parent context: Do your research, Venu 4 has all the "serious about running" training feature that FR 265 has and more. Reply: It cant be serious with it's lack of 5 button interface and weighing that much more. Runners needs forerunner...
  • Yeah I was considering 265 but the extra 100 euro put me off, plus I prefer buttons to touch screen

Sentiment

78 positive (67%) · 26 mixed (22%) · 12 negative (10%)

Trust + time weighted score: +59% · raw score 57%

What redditors said (10 of 116)

I would recommend the 265. It is on sale at Amazon for $299 vs the 165 which is $199 ($249 for the music version). 265 vs 165 gets you: * **Dual-band GPS** → more accurate in cities, woods, tall buildings * **Better heart-rate sensor** * **More advanced training tools** * **Music standard** (on all models) * **Bigger, sharper AMOLED** * **Multisport** for triathletes * **Faster processor** (snappier UI)
positive · u/A****7 · r/Garmin · comment · Dec 15, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I had the same hesitation as you, I ended up buying the 265. I use the touchscreen feature more often than I expected.
positive · u/w****f · r/Garmin · comment · Aug 16, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I came from an MIP 645 Music, I've turned the touchscreen off on my 265.
mixed · u/R****o · r/Garmin · comment · Jul 21, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I have the 265, and I love it.
positive · u/R****o · r/Garmin · comment · Jan 11, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I have a 265, I came from a 645 Music. - You're spot on about the Training Readiness, it's alright but nothing amazing. - I enjoy the AMOLED, but I was good with MIP too.
mixed · u/R****o · r/Garmin · comment · Jan 3, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
The bright display of the 265 and the rly good resolution is the biggest difference. ... If you dont have to worry about money, I'd take the 265, its great.
positive · u/c****a · r/Garmin · comment · Jan 3, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I'd suggest looking at the Forerunner 255, 265 and 570 and the 955 through 970; at the Instinct 2 and 3, and at the Fenix 7 if price is an object.
mixed · u/F****1 · r/Garmin · comment · Dec 30, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Forerunner 265 might be a good entry level. At least it was for me
positive · u/d****8 · r/Garmin · comment · Dec 30, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Parent context: FR265. Reply: Agreed. Spend the extra $50 and get the 265. It’s an awesome watch.
positive · u/j****y · r/Garmin · comment · Dec 29, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
going for the great value of a forerunner 265
positive · u/A****0 · r/Garmin · Dec 27, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗

Compare

Related