Canon RF 50mm f/1.8
Reddit take
AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote
The Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 is widely regarded as a high-value 'nifty fifty' that offers a significant upgrade over standard kit lenses for portraiture and low-light photography. While praised for its compact size and affordability, users frequently note technical compromises such as noisy autofocus and the lack of internal image stabilization.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price
- Extremely compact and lightweight, ideal for travel or jacket-pocket setups
- Produces pleasing bokeh and background separation for portraits
- Significant improvement in low-light performance compared to kit zoom lenses
- Sharp image quality, especially when stopped down
Cons
- Lacks internal image stabilization (IS)
- Autofocus motors are noticeably noisy
- Can be soft when shooting wide open at f/1.8
- Prone to focus hunting in some conditions
Caveats
- On APS-C (crop) sensor bodies, the focal length behaves like 80mm, which many find too tight for general indoor use
- Sharpness is best at f/2.8 or higher rather than at the maximum f/1.8 aperture
- Lack of IS may require keeping shutter speeds higher (e.g., 1/400s) to avoid blur
- Not recommended for video due to the audible autofocus motor
Best for
- Portrait photography
- Budget-conscious beginners moving beyond kit lenses
- Street photography with a minimal, discrete setup
- Low-light still photography
Avoid if
- You primarily shoot video and need silent autofocus
- You require built-in image stabilization for handheld shooting
- You frequently shoot in tight indoor spaces on a crop-sensor camera
This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 6-month half-life. The evidence is older, with a median source age of approximately 393 days, which is generally acceptable for stable hardware like lenses.
Sentiment
48 positive (70%) · 12 mixed (17%) · 9 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted score: +55% · raw score 57%
What redditors said (10 of 69)
I have a 50 1.8 and haven’t touched it since I got the 17-40
The RF lenses are very capable.
if you have extra money at some point then get a used or refurbished RF 50mm f/1.8 because with an r8, what you really gain is a major size advantage. The RF 50 *without an adapter* on an r8 gives you a jacket-pocket portrait monster.
I didn't like the 50mm with the R50. You can get some of the Bomeh you're seeking but it's too tight fkr most things as not image stabilized either.
I rarely use the 50. It Focus hunts, it's not sharp until past F2.8, and no IS ( I have unsteady hands).
It's a cheap and incredibly lightweight way to get f1.8 for whenever you need nice bokeh/background separation.
Rf 50mm is a great lens, but on a crop sensor it will act like 80mm, so you might not be able to take pictures indoors
The only RF lens I bought is the cheap RF 50/1.8, for product photography for my ebay store.
I have had a canon RP for a few years, I also have the RF 35mm f1.8, RF 50mm f1.8, and 85mm f2.
Your RF50 will go swimmingly with a full frame camera (albeit, a bit soft)
Compare
Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 vs Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMCanon RF 50mm f/1.8 vs Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USMCanon RF 50mm f/1.8 vs Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Related
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions
- Canon EOS R10 · related · 453 mentions