Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Reddit take
AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is highly praised as a versatile workhorse that excels in speed and precision. Users frequently describe the new autofocus system as 'sorcery' and highlight the pre-capture feature as a revolutionary addition for wildlife and sports photography. While it is a significant upgrade over the original R5 and older DSLR models, it introduces a slight trade-off in high-ISO noise performance due to its speed-oriented stacked sensor.
Pros
- Exceptional autofocus performance with reliable eye-tracking and 'Priority AF' for action.
- Pre-capture functionality is considered a game-changer for capturing unpredictable moments.
- Stacked sensor provides fast readout speeds, enabling 30 FPS with minimal rolling shutter.
- High-resolution 45MP sensor offers significant flexibility for cropping wildlife shots.
- Substantial upgrade path for users moving from the 5D series or the R6.
- Robust build quality, with reports of surviving accidental water submersion.
Cons
- Slightly worse low-light and high-ISO performance compared to the original R5.
- Poor native battery life when limited to the LP-E6 battery without the optional grip.
- Lack of built-in GPS, which was present in some older DSLR models.
- Ergonomics may feel small for users accustomed to integrated-grip bodies like the R3.
Caveats
- Firmware updates have been reported to occasionally wipe user settings; backing up to an SD card is recommended.
- The stacked sensor technology prioritizes readout speed over maximum dynamic range and noise floor at high ISOs.
- Dust can potentially affect button tactility in extreme environments, requiring professional cleaning.
Best for
- Wildlife and sports photographers who need elite autofocus and pre-burst capabilities.
- Hybrid shooters requiring high-resolution stills and 8K video.
- Professional photographers upgrading from older DSLR systems like the 5D Mark III or IV.
Avoid if
- You primarily shoot in extremely low-light conditions where high-ISO noise is the primary concern.
- You require built-in GPS for automatic geotagging without external accessories.
- You have very large hands and prefer the integrated vertical grip of the R3 series.
This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 6-month half-life. The evidence is based on a sample of 30 mentions from a total pool of 186, with a median source age of approximately 100 days.
Sentiment
138 positive (74%) · 35 mixed (19%) · 13 negative (7%)
Trust + time weighted score: +69% · raw score 67%
What redditors said (10 of 186)
If budget isn’t an issue then get the R6 II or even the R5II.
I’m digging the 8K 45mp of the R5ii but it lacks 4K fine recording format and shoots 4K line skipped and thus lacks detail ?
The face recognition AF and precapture are both big improvements to get the shots I want of my kid or his buddies, not the other team.
r5ii has a slightly faster sensor readout speed, so it should have better af tracking for stills.
I watched my camera completely submerge into the water while still in my hand. ... 1 week later, pop in a battery. Works fine. Pop in a card, everything writes without corrupting. Been using it for a year since and had zero issues.
I also didn't find the original R5 AF to be that much better than R7 usually. R5mkii there was a bigger AF jump
I traded my R7 for the R5ii, best decision ever lol.
Shot for the last 13 years on the Mark III, just got the R5ii. Whoever wrote this is smoking some loud. I guess you could stretch your brain to think this way, but I don’t see it.
I'm a recent owner of an R5 Mark II, which is fantastic camera. Absolutely no question. I've put maybe 20k on it in two months. It's got buckets of resolution, the AF is quick and precise and the image files are punchy and flexible. ... But I am finding it hard to love compared to the R3. I don't have big hands by any stretch, but the grip is a fragment small for my liking, especially the thumb rest. There's no inbuilt grip, that's a £500 option, and that means battery life is poor as we're restricted to the LP-E6 packaging for power. There's no GPS (the 6D had this!).
I'm a recent owner of an R5 Mark II, which is fantastic camera. Absolutely no question. I've put maybe 20k on it in two months. It's got buckets of resolution, the AF is quick and precise and the image files are punchy and flexible... But I am finding it hard to love compared to the R3. I don't have big hands by any stretch, but the grip is a fragment small for my liking, especially the thumb rest. There's no inbuilt grip, that's a £500 option, and that means battery life is poor as we're restricted to the LP-E6 packaging for power. There's no GPS (the 6D had this!).
Compare
Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs R6iiCanon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R10Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Related
- iPhone · related · 970 mentions
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions