Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Reddit take
AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote
The Canon EOS 5D Mark III is widely regarded on Reddit as a legendary 'workhorse' that remains a viable professional tool years after its release. While it lacks the cutting-edge autofocus and dynamic range of modern mirrorless systems, it is frequently recommended for its robust build quality, reliable performance, and exceptional value on the used market. It is often preferred over entry-level modern cameras for its 'pro' feel and optical viewfinder.
Pros
- Professional-grade build quality and superior weather sealing
- Significantly improved autofocus system compared to its predecessor (5D Mark II)
- Excellent value for money, frequently found used for $350-$400
- Reliable performance for paid professional work
- Optical viewfinder provides a natural viewing experience compared to electronic screens
Cons
- Outdated sensor technology with less dynamic range than the 5D Mark IV
- Heavy and bulky form factor compared to modern mirrorless alternatives
- Lacks modern mirrorless conveniences like eye-tracking AF
- Sensor is not as 'clean' as newer high-resolution sensors
Caveats
- Some users find that older EF lenses actually perform better when adapted to mirrorless bodies than they do natively on the 5D III
- While a significant upgrade from the Mark II, it is a notable step down in dynamic range from the Mark IV
Best for
- Budget-conscious photographers wanting a professional full-frame body
- Street photography and general-purpose professional work
- Users who specifically prefer a traditional DSLR experience and optical viewfinder
Avoid if
- You require the latest autofocus features like advanced eye-tracking
- You need maximum dynamic range for heavy shadow recovery in post-processing
- You want a lightweight, portable camera setup
This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 6-month half-life. The evidence is older (median age of ~304 days), which is typical for legacy hardware where long-term reliability is the primary focus of discussion.
Sentiment
59 positive (70%) · 14 mixed (17%) · 11 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted score: +59% · raw score 57%
What redditors said (10 of 84)
Note that the 5Ds is a 5D III with a higher resolution sensor- and the 5D III wasn’t that clean of a sensor to begin with, so it’s an all around upgrade!
the AF performance difference is significant enough to make the 5D III a more attractive option for most shooting, and the DR/colour differences between the two is minor enough to not be worth worrying about for most types of shooting, including street photography. ... In just about every other way, I think the 5D III is preferable, including a significantly better AF system, better build and weather sealing, plus more and better controls.
Lenses like this do no favour to the 5D3.
I would prefer a 5D3 over the R50 though, but it is also double the weight it your T7, it is a heavy brick.
I think a used full-frame DSLR like a Canon 5D Mark III or a Nikon D610 would be great budget options. Both have dual card slots.
5D3 is sluggish.
I just ordered a 5D Mark III. I'm happy to read this message 😄
I have a mk3 I got for 400 bucks and thought I got a steal.
Fantastic camera still use one today
I own both the II and III, and calling the latter "film-like" is just completely nuts considering how it starts the era of Canon's image processing going into the digital era. Even if you shoot RAW it's still a distinctively different style compared to the models before it.
Compare
Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs R6iiCanon EOS 5D Mark III vs Canon EOS R10Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Related
- iPhone · related · 970 mentions
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions