Canon 50mm f/1.8
Reddit take
AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote
Widely known as the 'Nifty Fifty,' the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is a staple prime lens celebrated for its high value-to-price ratio. It is frequently recommended as a first upgrade from a kit lens due to its compact size, low-light capabilities, and ability to produce pleasing bokeh for portraits. While it is generally praised for its affordability, users frequently note that it lacks sharpness when shot wide open at f/1.8 and can suffer from sluggish or noisy autofocus, particularly in servo mode or when used with older adapters.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price, often found for $150-$200
- Produces great bokeh, making it excellent for portraiture
- Compact and lightweight enough to be a permanent fixture in a camera bag
- Versatile for various styles including low-light, street, and even basic astrophotography
Cons
- Lacks sharpness when used at its maximum f/1.8 aperture
- Autofocus can be slow and 'annoying' in servo mode for moving subjects
- Build quality is basic; some users report it feels 'dinky' compared to L-series glass
Caveats
- On APS-C sensor cameras (like the R50), the focal length effectively becomes 80mm, which may be too tight for general-purpose use
- AF performance can vary significantly depending on whether it is a native RF mount or an adapted EF version
Best for
- Beginners looking for their first prime lens
- Portrait photography on a budget
- Low-light indoor environments where kit zooms struggle
Avoid if
- You require tack-sharp performance at f/1.8
- You already use a 35mm and 85mm prime combo, which may make the 50mm feel redundant
- You need silent and near-instant autofocus for professional sports or video
This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 6-month half-life. The evidence is older (median age ~383 days), so confidence is medium for this hardware item.
Sentiment
44 positive (59%) · 22 mixed (30%) · 8 negative (11%)
Trust + time weighted score: +49% · raw score 49%
What redditors said (10 of 74)
Incredible lens for the price.
The 50mm 1.8 and 40mm 2.8 are good starting points.
I have a 35, 50, and 85, and I literally *never* use the 50. I just use the 35 and crop a bit when necessary, or if I genuinely need substantially more reach, the 85 goes on.
You really can’t go wrong with the nifty fifty. It’s fairly cheap, sharp, it produces great bokeh, it’s excellent for portraits. You can’t beat that 200$ price tag; moreover, it usually goes for 150$~ on the second hand market!
Be aware that on the R50, the 50mm f/1.8 will effectively be a 80mm, that is a short tele. It might put some limitations on the usefulness of that lens.
I got the RF 70-200 f4 aswell as the 35 f1.8 and the 50mm 1.8.
85 f2 (and f1.2) are a great indoor sports lens, as are all flavors of the 50mm, and I'm sure the new 45mm 1.2 will be as well.
If you can get mat-side, I find a 50mm is perfect for smaller mats and an 85 works great for larger ones.
I got RF 100-400 for birding and 50mm f/1.8 for Potrait Photoshoot. ... Though working with 50mm prime lens went fine, got some good captures, felt thight in ocassions.
For a prime, the 50mm 1.8 is amazing. I mostly use mine for portraits/family pictures, and now and then in low light if i have enough room.
Compare
Canon 50mm f/1.8 vs Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMCanon 50mm f/1.8 vs Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USMCanon 50mm f/1.8 vs Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Related
- 50/1.8 · variant · 13 mentions
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions
- Canon EOS R10 · related · 453 mentions