trustmebro.reviews

Canon 24-105mm f/2.8

Physical Product · Camera lenses · 10 mentions · 1 subreddit · discussed in r/canon

Reddit take

Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.

Pros

  • Now I have the 24-105/2.8 and it has a collar.
  • As pure performance goes, the 24-105 2.8 is regarded as one of the best Canon put out in RF zooms.
  • I would start with r5 mark2. And 24-70 2.8. Splurge option: 24-105 2.8.
  • It’s my bread and butter for both video and photo work. I absolutely love this lens. I honestly think it’s Canon’s best lens. You can even balance it on a gimbal, because of the internal zoom.

Cons

  • It's not small though and one can feel it's not comfortable to use as a travel lens (or can be intimidating to others bringing out a big lens)
  • The 24-105 2.8 is way too big n heavy apart from professional events
  • I would rather miss the one extra stop or take a prime with me than walk around all day with that 24-105 2.8.
  • Too big, too expensive, too video.
  • It's just that it's more expensive and heavier. The people who *need* it usually need it for reasons beyond the 71-105, like internal zooming and things that help with video. It's kinda-sorta more of a video lens than a photography lens...

Sentiment

4 positive (40%) · 1 mixed (10%) · 5 negative (50%)

Trust + time weighted score: -6% · raw score -10%

What redditors said (10 of 10)

Now I have the 24-105/2.8 and it has a collar.
positive · u/S****y · r/canon · comment · Nov 15, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
As pure performance goes, the 24-105 2.8 is regarded as one of the best Canon put out in RF zooms.
positive · u/A****n · r/canon · comment · Aug 21, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
It's not small though and one can feel it's not comfortable to use as a travel lens (or can be intimidating to others bringing out a big lens)
negative · u/A****n · r/canon · comment · Aug 21, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I would start with r5 mark2. And 24-70 2.8. Splurge option: 24-105 2.8.
positive · u/s****n · r/canon · comment · Aug 21, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
The 24-105 2.8 is way too big n heavy apart from professional events
negative · u/R****o · r/canon · comment · Jul 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I would rather miss the one extra stop or take a prime with me than walk around all day with that 24-105 2.8.
negative · u/V****d · r/canon · comment · Jul 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
It’s my bread and butter for both video and photo work. I absolutely love this lens. I honestly think it’s Canon’s best lens. You can even balance it on a gimbal, because of the internal zoom.
positive · u/D****s · r/canon · comment · Jul 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Too big, too expensive, too video.
negative · u/W****r · r/canon · comment · Jul 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
It's just that it's more expensive and heavier. The people who *need* it usually need it for reasons beyond the 71-105, like internal zooming and things that help with video. It's kinda-sorta more of a video lens than a photography lens (though it's aces at photography).
mixed · u/e****n · r/canon · comment · Jul 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Price, weight, and length. It sounds great to me when I hear it, but then I see it in person and it is just too much.
negative · u/V****6 · r/canon · comment · Jul 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗

Compare

Related