Canon 24-105mm f/2.8
Reddit take
Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.
Pros
- Now I have the 24-105/2.8 and it has a collar.
- As pure performance goes, the 24-105 2.8 is regarded as one of the best Canon put out in RF zooms.
- I would start with r5 mark2. And 24-70 2.8. Splurge option: 24-105 2.8.
- It’s my bread and butter for both video and photo work. I absolutely love this lens. I honestly think it’s Canon’s best lens. You can even balance it on a gimbal, because of the internal zoom.
Cons
- It's not small though and one can feel it's not comfortable to use as a travel lens (or can be intimidating to others bringing out a big lens)
- The 24-105 2.8 is way too big n heavy apart from professional events
- I would rather miss the one extra stop or take a prime with me than walk around all day with that 24-105 2.8.
- Too big, too expensive, too video.
- It's just that it's more expensive and heavier. The people who *need* it usually need it for reasons beyond the 71-105, like internal zooming and things that help with video. It's kinda-sorta more of a video lens than a photography lens...
Sentiment
4 positive (40%) · 1 mixed (10%) · 5 negative (50%)
Trust + time weighted score: -6% · raw score -10%
What redditors said (10 of 10)
Now I have the 24-105/2.8 and it has a collar.
As pure performance goes, the 24-105 2.8 is regarded as one of the best Canon put out in RF zooms.
It's not small though and one can feel it's not comfortable to use as a travel lens (or can be intimidating to others bringing out a big lens)
I would start with r5 mark2. And 24-70 2.8. Splurge option: 24-105 2.8.
The 24-105 2.8 is way too big n heavy apart from professional events
I would rather miss the one extra stop or take a prime with me than walk around all day with that 24-105 2.8.
It’s my bread and butter for both video and photo work. I absolutely love this lens. I honestly think it’s Canon’s best lens. You can even balance it on a gimbal, because of the internal zoom.
Too big, too expensive, too video.
It's just that it's more expensive and heavier. The people who *need* it usually need it for reasons beyond the 71-105, like internal zooming and things that help with video. It's kinda-sorta more of a video lens than a photography lens (though it's aces at photography).
Price, weight, and length. It sounds great to me when I hear it, but then I see it in person and it is just too much.
Compare
Canon 24-105mm f/2.8 vs Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMCanon 24-105mm f/2.8 vs Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USMCanon 24-105mm f/2.8 vs Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Related
- Canon EOS R7 · related · 750 mentions
- Canon EOS R8 · related · 736 mentions
- Sennheiser HD 600 · related · 638 mentions
- R6ii · related · 611 mentions
- Canon EOS R50 · related · 602 mentions
- Canon EOS R10 · related · 453 mentions