Side by side
Ultramarine Linux vs Linux Mint XFCE
Ultramarine Linux
24 positive (100%) · 0 mixed (0%) · 0 negative (0%)
Trust + time weighted: +100%
Top excerpts
I've been using Ultramarine Gnome for several years now, and I've really liked it.
Bazzite and Ultramarine are both distros based on Fedora that work well with games and day to day stuff in general.
Ultramarine if you want it setup out of the box.
if you want it all set up out of the box, you should give Ultramarine a look.
I suggest you take a look at Ultramarine
Linux Mint XFCE
46 positive (94%) · 1 mixed (2%) · 2 negative (4%)
Trust + time weighted: +88%
AI summary — not a quote
Linux Mint XFCE is highly regarded as a top-tier choice for reviving older or low-spec hardware. Users consistently praise its speed and lightweight nature, often describing it as a "wicked fast" solution for "potato" PCs and older laptops. While it is noted for being stable and functional out of the box, some users find the default aesthetic a bit plain and suggest that it requires manual tweaking to look modern.
Pros
- Excellent performance on older hardware, including devices with as little as 3GB to 4GB of RAM.
- Extremely lightweight and runs smoothly, especially when paired with an SSD.
- Highly stable and reliable for daily tasks like web browsing and office work.
- A go-to recommendation for users switching from Windows on older machines.
Cons
- The default user interface is described as plain or "no-frills."
- May require manual customization/tweaking for users who prefer a modern visual aesthetic.
Top excerpts
Mint Xfce.
Don’t use Mint Xfce though, I don’t find it that good.
my previous experience is linux mint xfce and it did wonders to my old and weak pc
Mint XFCE! Cinnamon one can perform quite bad on lower end machines, for example on my T480 (i5-8350u) it works quite bad, compared to something like KDE Plasma.
But I tested Mint (XFCE), Fedora (KDE) and Ubuntu and Mint used the less amount if RAM