Side by side
Tank 300 vs Tank 500
Tank 300
108 positive (82%) · 20 mixed (15%) · 3 negative (2%)
Trust + time weighted: +82%
AI summary — not a quote
The Tank 300 is highly regarded by owners in the UAE as a rugged and capable 4x4 that balances off-road performance with urban comfort. Many users consider it a value-driven alternative to the Jeep Wrangler, praising its inclusion of off-road features like differential locks and its comfortable interior. While its fuel economy is frequently cited as a drawback, the vehicle is well-received for its reliability, solid warranty offerings, and professional service through local distributors.
Pros
- Strong off-road capability with 4x4 systems and differential locks comparable to higher-end rugged SUVs
- High level of interior comfort and a smooth driving experience for a body-on-frame vehicle
- Excellent value for money, often including comprehensive service packages and long-term warranties
- Equipped with proper recovery points, making it more suitable for sand driving than many other Chinese SUVs
Cons
- Poor fuel economy, with owners reporting approximately 12-13L/100km during routine highway driving
- Higher price point compared to smaller off-roaders like the Suzuki Jimny
- Subjective exterior styling that may not appeal to all buyers
Top excerpts
Tank is great, but thirsty.
Best car in the segment
I test drove both Tank 300 - petrol and hybrid, G700. Although I liked G700 more, the price range for me was just not making sense
Just look at the Australians using it, it's insanely capable and there's a large active group of tank 300, 500 & 700 in the UAE.
Tank 300 is your quintessential FJ/Prado alternative. the petrol only comes with the ZF 8HP transmission! and major mod support already exists.
Tank 500
63 positive (73%) · 15 mixed (17%) · 8 negative (9%)
Trust + time weighted: +66%
AI summary — not a quote
The Tank 500 is frequently cited as a high-value alternative to traditional full-size SUVs like the Toyota Prado, particularly in the UAE market. Owners and reviewers highlight its premium interior, smooth 3.0L twin-turbo V6 engine, and advanced technology suite as its strongest selling points. While it offers a luxury experience at a lower price point than many competitors, it is widely criticized for its heavy fuel consumption and high insurance costs.
Pros
- Smooth and powerful 3.0L twin-turbo V6 engine with a quiet 9-speed automatic transmission
- Exceptional value-for-money with luxury features that rival more expensive brands
- High-quality interior materials, including Nappa leather and supportive 7-way adjustable seats
- Advanced technology package featuring a fast UI, consistent wireless CarPlay, and a clear 360-degree camera
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption, with multiple users reporting approximately 20L/100km
- Expensive annual insurance premiums
- The Hybrid variant is reported to feel slow compared to the V6 twin-turbo model
- Some users find the exterior styling to be outdated or less appealing than the Tank 400
Top excerpts
If hardcore offloading is not a requirement, tank 500 is better (the v6 one)
Tank 500 is cheaper but isn't as feature packed (not sure if fuel economy is good with tank cars) so he wouldn't want it.
Tank 500 would be the better serious off-roader.
Tank 500. Don’t knock it til you try it
I also feel tank-500 has more smoother drive compared to tank-300 , but it comes with extra cost , if budget permits take a look at it as well . Wonderful car