Side by side
Tank 300 vs Mazda CX-5
Tank 300
108 positive (82%) · 20 mixed (15%) · 3 negative (2%)
Trust + time weighted: +82%
AI summary — not a quote
The Tank 300 is highly regarded by owners in the UAE as a rugged and capable 4x4 that balances off-road performance with urban comfort. Many users consider it a value-driven alternative to the Jeep Wrangler, praising its inclusion of off-road features like differential locks and its comfortable interior. While its fuel economy is frequently cited as a drawback, the vehicle is well-received for its reliability, solid warranty offerings, and professional service through local distributors.
Pros
- Strong off-road capability with 4x4 systems and differential locks comparable to higher-end rugged SUVs
- High level of interior comfort and a smooth driving experience for a body-on-frame vehicle
- Excellent value for money, often including comprehensive service packages and long-term warranties
- Equipped with proper recovery points, making it more suitable for sand driving than many other Chinese SUVs
Cons
- Poor fuel economy, with owners reporting approximately 12-13L/100km during routine highway driving
- Higher price point compared to smaller off-roaders like the Suzuki Jimny
- Subjective exterior styling that may not appeal to all buyers
Top excerpts
Tank is great, but thirsty.
Best car in the segment
I test drove both Tank 300 - petrol and hybrid, G700. Although I liked G700 more, the price range for me was just not making sense
Just look at the Australians using it, it's insanely capable and there's a large active group of tank 300, 500 & 700 in the UAE.
Tank 300 is your quintessential FJ/Prado alternative. the petrol only comes with the ZF 8HP transmission! and major mod support already exists.
Mazda CX-5
288 positive (71%) · 65 mixed (16%) · 53 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +62%
AI summary — not a quote
The Mazda CX-5 is a staple recommendation within automotive communities, frequently praised for its reliability, premium interior feel, and superior handling compared to rivals like the Toyota RAV4. While it is often described as a 'near-luxury' experience at a non-luxury price point, some users suggest the vehicle is overhyped, noting that while it is a solid performer, it may not deliver the 'god-tier' driving experience its reputation suggests. Common criticisms center on its relatively cramped rear seating and occasionally underwhelming highway passing power.
Pros
- Strong long-term reliability, particularly with Skyactiv engines
- Premium interior quality and features (e.g., heated steering wheel, 360 camera) that punch above its price class
- Superior handling and driving dynamics compared to many other compact SUVs
- Many units are still manufactured in Japan, which is a point of confidence for some owners
Cons
- Rear legroom and overall back seat space can feel cramped compared to competitors like the Honda CR-V or Nissan X-Trail
- Base engine performance may feel insufficient for aggressive highway passing
- Technology and infotainment features may lag behind some newer competitors
Top excerpts
Then went to test the CX5 and immediately decided to stop looking.
That’s about what a whole 2020 Mazda cx-5 is going for here.
If you need an SUV the CX-5 if you want a cross over smaller go to a CX-3. Great cars.
RAV4 is probably the worst rental SUV I’ve ever driven. The drony engine and body roll are not worth putting up for reliability sake, especially when a CX-5 exists.
Since you like Mazda look at a Mazda CX5, They are smaller, not so gigantically SUVish.