Side by side
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs Canon EOS R6
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
64 positive (78%) · 17 mixed (21%) · 1 negative (1%)
Trust + time weighted: +76%
AI summary — not a quote
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is widely considered one of the greatest professional DSLRs ever produced. Even as the industry shifts toward mirrorless systems, it remains a highly respected workhorse for professional portrait and wedding photography due to its rugged build, reliable performance, and excellent image quality.
Pros
- Exceptional image quality and color science in both RAW and JPEG
- Extremely durable and rugged professional build
- Proven reliability for high-stakes event and wedding photography
- Excellent value on the used market compared to modern mirrorless equivalents
Cons
- Autofocus system is significantly less advanced than modern mirrorless eye-tracking
- Video performance is surpassed by newer, more affordable mirrorless bodies like the EOS RP
- Heavier and bulkier than modern mirrorless alternatives
- Incremental improvement over the 5D Mark III rather than a revolutionary leap
Top excerpts
5Ds is a better camera, better file, though today I'd opt for a 5Div.
It’s probably the greatest professional 35mm DSLR to ever be produced, and since the world has gone mirrorless, it will likely hold that title forever.
Mark iv is a great camera but everything has gone mirrorless now. It doesn’t diminish the value of the Mark iv or its ability to get work done
This is a legend of a camera.
I bought mine in 2015 and used it a *lot* until my 5D Mark IV all but replaced it in late 2019.
Canon EOS R6
176 positive (78%) · 36 mixed (16%) · 15 negative (7%)
Trust + time weighted: +71%
AI summary — not a quote
The Canon EOS R6 is widely regarded as a professional-grade workhorse, particularly praised for its ergonomics, snappy autofocus, and exceptional low-light performance. It is frequently cited as the ideal upgrade path for users moving from older DSLR systems like the 5D series, offering modern features like In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) and dual SD card slots that make it a reliable choice for event and wedding photography. While it is highly valued for stills, some users find its physical footprint too bulky for casual travel and note that battery life can be a limiting factor.
Pros
- Excellent ergonomics featuring a dedicated AF joystick and rear control wheel.
- Highly effective autofocus system that is often described as a significant leap over older DSLRs.
- Strong high-ISO performance with minimal noise, making it suitable for low-light environments.
- Dual SD card slots provide necessary redundancy for professional wedding and event work.
Cons
- Large and 'chunky' body size can be cumbersome for travel or long periods of carry.
- Battery life is frequently criticized as a weak point.
- Lower megapixel count compared to higher-tier models like the R5 or older high-res DSLRs.
- High-use units may experience shutter sticking or system crashes as they approach very high actuation counts (near 500k).
Top excerpts
For birding with the R6, anything over 6400 ISO is getting into too much noise territory.
I bought a used R6 and EF/RF adapter (without the control ring). I am very happy with this decision after about five months of getting used to it all.
If you don’t do the video R6 is the best bang for your buck stills camera.
With my R6, now I have dual SD cards and mirrored archive storage.
On paper at least, the R6 III seems a little more balanced an update, giving stills photographers some nice improvements—especially those still using the original R6