The Sword of Shannara
Reddit take
Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.
Pros
- Sword is more important for it's standing historically in fantasy, starting up epic fantasy once again. ... It has a few beats than are different than LOTR, and honestly, I like the Sword concept and how it applies at the end.
- Our copy had a totally sweet Brothers Hildebrandt gatefold illustration that blew my tiny mind. It's also kinda fun, accessible, slightly unserious but very much earnest honest fantasy from a time before the formula was nailed down, poli...
- It was one of my favorite books as a teen, but that was long ago and it was one of the first fantasy books I read so I’m biased.
- I enjoyed it when I read it back when it was first published.
Cons
- It's not that it is similar, it is that Terry Brooks' process was cynically taking plot points beat for beat from LotR and stripping out all the mythology, poetry, and linguistics. This isnt just a meanspirited criticism, it's his own ex...
- Sword is very much a product of it's time - it has some good moments, but mostly its just an average book with nothing special going on.
- Parent context: As close to a 1:1 lotr (as far as plot and characters) as it gets, except for originality and depth. There's moments that are interesting and scratch the fantasy itch, but it's 70% slog IMO Reply: But I should mention the...
- As close to a 1:1 lotr (as far as plot and characters) as it gets, except for originality and depth. There's moments that are interesting and scratch the fantasy itch, but it's 70% slog IMO
- As a stand-lone book judged on its own merits? Not really no.
Sentiment
4 positive (40%) · 2 mixed (20%) · 4 negative (40%)
Trust + time weighted score: -1% · raw score 0%
What redditors said (10 of 10)
It's not that it is similar, it is that Terry Brooks' process was cynically taking plot points beat for beat from LotR and stripping out all the mythology, poetry, and linguistics. This isnt just a meanspirited criticism, it's his own explanation of his writing. Also (related) it sucks.
Sword is very much a product of it's time - it has some good moments, but mostly its just an average book with nothing special going on.
Sword is more important for it's standing historically in fantasy, starting up epic fantasy once again. ... It has a few beats than are different than LOTR, and honestly, I like the Sword concept and how it applies at the end.
Parent context: As close to a 1:1 lotr (as far as plot and characters) as it gets, except for originality and depth. There's moments that are interesting and scratch the fantasy itch, but it's 70% slog IMO Reply: But I should mention the immediate sequel is a massive leap in quality.
As close to a 1:1 lotr (as far as plot and characters) as it gets, except for originality and depth. There's moments that are interesting and scratch the fantasy itch, but it's 70% slog IMO
Our copy had a totally sweet Brothers Hildebrandt gatefold illustration that blew my tiny mind. It's also kinda fun, accessible, slightly unserious but very much earnest honest fantasy from a time before the formula was nailed down, polished to death and franchised out to the legion of "like that but this" book series.
It was one of my favorite books as a teen, but that was long ago and it was one of the first fantasy books I read so I’m biased.
I enjoyed it when I read it back when it was first published.
As a stand-lone book judged on its own merits? Not really no.
Maybe Sword of Shannara, but that’s dependent on how much you don’t mind it being troperiffic and too derivative.
Compare
The Sword of Shannara vs CirceThe Sword of Shannara vs PiranesiThe Sword of Shannara vs Howl's Moving Castle
Related
- Dungeon Crawler Carl · related · 951 mentions
- The Wheel of Time · related · 527 mentions
- Red Rising · related · 453 mentions
- Piranesi · related · 445 mentions
- Between Two Fires · related · 428 mentions
- Malazan Book of the Fallen · related · 416 mentions