Sid Meier's Civilization V
Reddit take
Not enough linked mention summaries yet; the source excerpts below are the evidence.
Pros
- My 1060 still plays valheim and civ 5 just fine.
- 5 and 6 are a lot of fun, but 4 is loosely agreed upon as the best so it makes sense you may have been turned off.
- There are very few game endings more satisfying than seeing all your rivals with beat up faces at the end of Civ 3.
- 4 is peak civ, played countless hours of civ 1-3 and then 4 when it came out but have never been able to get into any of the them after 4.
- If you like the Civ series I'd say start with Civ 6 but there are other 4K series out there.
Cons
- When the fifth one came out it felt so dumbed down compared to the last part (with expansions) that I just went back to IV.
- Civ 7 is a terrible entrypoint to the 4K strategy genre because of everything the OP praised it for; it's simply too different from the rest of the genre. That isn't to say it's a bad game just that you should not use it to set your expe...
- yeah in civ 5 you settle like 4 cities and that is it generally
- Instead of one long game, it's three minigames that are always exactly the same. They always begin and end the at the same point. You say they each have unique goals, which is true, but those goals are always the same every game. It's th...
- Ackchually Civ5 is arguably the game that punishes you more for having cities for the whole unhappiness mechanic
Sentiment
16 positive (52%) · 4 mixed (13%) · 11 negative (35%)
Trust + time weighted score: +18% · raw score 16%
What redditors said (10 of 31)
My 1060 still plays valheim and civ 5 just fine.
5 and 6 are a lot of fun, but 4 is loosely agreed upon as the best so it makes sense you may have been turned off.
5 and 6 are a lot of fun, but 4 is loosely agreed upon as the best so it makes sense you may have been turned off.
5 and 6 are a lot of fun, but 4 is loosely agreed upon as the best so it makes sense you may have been turned off.
When the fifth one came out it felt so dumbed down compared to the last part (with expansions) that I just went back to IV.
There are very few game endings more satisfying than seeing all your rivals with beat up faces at the end of Civ 3.
4 is peak civ, played countless hours of civ 1-3 and then 4 when it came out but have never been able to get into any of the them after 4.
If you like the Civ series I'd say start with Civ 6 but there are other 4K series out there.
Civ 7 is a terrible entrypoint to the 4K strategy genre because of everything the OP praised it for; it's simply too different from the rest of the genre. That isn't to say it's a bad game just that you should not use it to set your expectations for what the rest of the genre is like. ... to Civ 7's credit it's an exception, it's fairly easy to learn. However that comes with a price, there's not much replayability to it.
yeah in civ 5 you settle like 4 cities and that is it generally
Compare
Sid Meier's Civilization V vs Unicorn OverlordSid Meier's Civilization V vs Into the BreachSid Meier's Civilization V vs XCOM
Related
- Cyberpunk 2077 · related · 277 mentions
- Elden Ring · related · 165 mentions
- Red Dead Redemption 2 · related · 147 mentions
- Baldur's Gate 3 · related · 146 mentions
- Wingspan · related · 120 mentions
- Hollow Knight · related · 119 mentions