Serious Eats
Reddit take
AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote
Serious Eats is highly regarded by the Reddit cooking community for its science-based approach to recipes, emphasizing thorough testing and technical explanations. Users frequently cite it alongside America's Test Kitchen as a gold standard for "foolproof" results. However, the site is also known for its complexity, with many recipes described as time-consuming "projects" that may be too involved for casual daily cooking.
Pros
- Extensively tested, reliable recipes that are often described as 'foolproof'
- Provides deep dives into the science ('hows and whys') of cooking
- High accuracy regarding technical details like temperature, timing, and methods
- Excellent for learning fundamental techniques that elevate home cooking
Cons
- Many recipes are complex and require significant time and effort
- Occasional reports of recipe instability, such as over-loading specific ingredients like cheese
- Some users find the recipes unnecessarily complicated for the final result
- Criticism from some users regarding product placement and an 'advertising mill' feel in newer content
Caveats
- There is a noted distinction between 'old school' Serious Eats content and its more recent iterations
- While the food science posts are highly educational, some long-term users find they eventually move away from the specific recipes themselves
- Often categorized as 'project' cooking rather than quick weeknight meal prep
Best for
- Home cooks who want to understand the technical science behind their food
- People looking for high-end or 'perfected' versions of classic dishes
- Beginners who need detailed, step-by-step guidance and explanations
Avoid if
- You prefer quick, simple, and low-effort recipes
- You are looking for concise instructions without lengthy technical background
- You are sensitive to integrated advertising and product placement
This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 6-month half-life. The evidence is older (median age ~560 days), which may not reflect the most recent editorial changes to the service.
Sentiment
18 positive (82%) · 3 mixed (14%) · 1 negative (5%)
Trust + time weighted score: +75% · raw score 77%
What redditors said (10 of 22)
For general cooking, NYT, ATK, J Kenji Lopez-Alt, and old school Serious Eats.
[Serious Eats](https://www.seriouseats.com/perfect-prime-rib-beef-recipe) article for the science behind it.
I would watch hours of good eats reruns and ate up Serious Eats blog posts. I will say that 15+ years later I never do recipes from either. ... I do think those food science type posts are great for starting out. I don’t like them for recipes.
SE is an advertising mill. They adjust recipes to push advertiser products, do product placement, and frequently make recipes unnecessarily complicated to make themselves look smart.
Serious Eats is my go-to for any accuracy questions (time, temp, best preparation method)
These days, I focus on using Serious Eats for high-end
This is interesting because the methods I saw (including Serious Eats as well as the one I followed) called for starting with a cold pan!
Check out Cooks Illustrated/America’s Test Kitchen or Serious Eats. They have excellent, fool proof recipes that always turn out great because they are tested extensively before being published.
Serious Eats has a decent enough recipe.
Serious Eats. They explain the how’s and whys and often times give you options and examples of how different variables will impact the final result.
Compare
Serious Eats vs Budget BytesSerious Eats vs induction cooking
Related
- Instagram · related · 118 mentions
- Google Translate · related · 91 mentions
- TikTok · related · 54 mentions
- Bilt Rewards · related · 51 mentions
- Cronometer · related · 33 mentions
- Budget Bytes · related · 30 mentions