trustmebro.reviews

God of War Ragnarök

Media Title · Action & adventure games · 36 mentions · 1 subreddit · discussed in r/patientgamers

Reddit take

AI summary of the Reddit excerpts below — not a quote

God of War Ragnarök is frequently characterized as a mechanically refined but narratively bloated sequel to its 2018 predecessor. While many players appreciate the expanded enemy variety and combat depth, there is significant criticism regarding the game's pacing, the mandatory Atreus gameplay segments, and a story that some feel was over-condensed or disjointed.

Pros

  • Significantly improved enemy variety and more frequent boss encounters compared to the previous game.
  • Refined combat mechanics, including the addition of a new spear weapon with unique detonation features.
  • High-quality voice acting and character performances, particularly Richard Schiff as Odin.
  • Excellent art direction and visual presentation.

Cons

  • Pacing issues, with specific criticism directed at the lengthy Jotunheim and Atreus-led sections.
  • Intrusive NPC dialogue that frequently spoils puzzle solutions before the player can solve them.
  • Combat can feel 'tedious' due to 'damage sponge' enemies that take a long time to defeat.
  • Narrative feels disjointed to some, reportedly due to condensing a planned trilogy into two games.

Caveats

  • Opinions on combat are mixed; while some see it as a vast improvement, others find it less 'crunchy' or satisfying than the 2018 entry.
  • The game's tone is described by some as more 'lighthearted' or 'fairy tale' like, which may clash with expectations for the series.

Best for

  • Players who enjoyed the 2018 reboot's core loop but wanted more complex combat and enemy types.
  • Fans of high-production AAA cinematic action games.

Avoid if

  • You are easily annoyed by NPCs constantly providing puzzle hints.
  • You prefer a tightly paced, focused narrative without significant 'bloat' or mandatory side-character segments.
  • You found the combat in the previous game already bordered on being too repetitive.

This summary uses balanced time weighting with about a 122-month half-life. The evidence is primarily drawn from r/patientgamers with a median source age of approximately 607 days, reflecting a retrospective and often more critical perspective than initial launch reviews.

Sentiment

6 positive (17%) · 11 mixed (31%) · 19 negative (53%)

Trust + time weighted score: -37% · raw score -36%

What redditors said (10 of 36)

The enemies take much longer to kill in Ragnarok. They're not smarter or more fun. There are just a ton of them that sponge up damage. It's tedious and boring.
negative · u/w****_ · r/patientgamers · comment · Dec 14, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
The pacing was a bit weird which burned me out
negative · u/S****6 · r/patientgamers · comment · Dec 14, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Tried Ragnarok a year later, lasted an hour. I think I'll pass on future entries.
negative · u/A****r · r/patientgamers · comment · Dec 14, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I've replayed 2018 after Ragnarok and there's something definitely different about the combat. I'm not really sure on how to phrase it but the combat feels less crunchy and satisfying in the sequel.
negative · u/S****8 · r/patientgamers · comment · Dec 14, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
My gaming tastes have changed quite a bit since then though, to the point that I really struggled to get through Ragnarok.
negative · u/B****4 · r/patientgamers · comment · Dec 14, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Loved GoW 2018 but Ragnarok was one of the most disappointing AAA games I've ever played.
negative · u/w****e · r/patientgamers · comment · Nov 12, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
I enjoyed the shout-out it got in God of War Ragnarok, when Kratos says it's unwise to go back and undo your previous mistakes, and Mimir says "oh, you're talking literally?!"
mixed · u/C****2 · r/patientgamers · comment · Nov 7, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
When I played Ragnarok, I was surprised to get the same feeling as the first game. It felt like the realms were small with few inhabitants. Even reaching Asgard, I remember getting the first glimpse of what surprised me to be just a medium sized village and just feeling like they didn't really deliver on the scope. The intrigue that 2018 put in me as to what amazing things were ahead just didn't get a satisfying resolution.
negative · u/A****5 · r/patientgamers · comment · Feb 11, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
Parent context: I'm on the fence about playing Ragnarok after this one. Maybe I just got tired from the game by the end and I just need to play something else for a while. I heard that story is much weaker in Ragnarok, do you find it to be the case? Reply: It's weaker in some ways but I think the highest high is easily on the same level as the first, if not higher. It's just that the lows are lower. Maybe take a break for a bit but I think the combat is more exciting in Ragnarok and so are the combat encounters.
mixed · u/Q****h · r/patientgamers · comment · Feb 11, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗
The story of ragnarock was nowhere near as compelling to me as 2018.
negative · u/T****3 · r/patientgamers · comment · Feb 11, 2025 · open on Reddit ↗

Compare

Related