Side by side
Thermalright vs Apple M4
Thermalright
69 positive (90%) · 4 mixed (5%) · 4 negative (5%)
Trust + time weighted: +84%
AI summary — not a quote
Thermalright is highly regarded as a leading budget-friendly brand for PC cooling, frequently recommended for its exceptional price-to-performance ratio. Reddit users often position it as a modern alternative to legacy budget kings, noting that its air coolers and AIOs often perform within a few degrees of premium competitors like Noctua at a fraction of the cost. While the brand is a staple for value-oriented builds, some users report concerns regarding quality control and specific product categories like power supplies.
Pros
- Exceptional value with performance often rivaling premium brands for a much lower price
- Wide variety of cooling products including air coolers, AIOs, and specialized fans (slim, aRGB, reverse blade)
- Newer designs offer improved RAM clearance and better visibility for RGB components
- Typically includes thermal paste in the box, even with budget models
Cons
- Reports of inconsistent quality control, particularly with AIO liquid coolers
- Mixed experiences with the RMA process and long-term customer support
- Allegations of misleading certifications on their power supply units (PSUs)
Top excerpts
if you are really trying to penny pinch I think Thermalright and ID cooling have marginally cheaper cpu coolers for like 20$
If you're on a budget, other manufacturers produce excellent performing fans with aRGB for a much lower price. They include Thermalright, Arctic, Cooler Master.
but a good Thermalright is cheap
Cpu cooler: aio or air still not sure but Arctic liquid 3 pro or -Corsair Nautilus if air is done then thermalright, noctua or sudokoo
I did hear some great things about thermalright, I'm considering getting a cheaper fan indeed
Apple M4
42 positive (82%) · 5 mixed (10%) · 4 negative (8%)
Trust + time weighted: +78%
AI summary — not a quote
The Apple M4 chip is highly regarded as a significant performance and efficiency leap, particularly for users upgrading from M1 or Intel-based systems. While enthusiasts praise its improved GPU architecture for gaming and its potential for long-term use, some note that the performance gains over the M2 may feel marginal for basic productivity tasks like web browsing or Excel.
Pros
- Noticeable performance boost over M1 and M2 chips
- Improved GPU architecture provides a better experience for gaming
- High power efficiency compared to earlier generations
- Strong value proposition when found at sale prices (frequently cited around $750-$800)
Cons
- Hardware is not upgradeable, requiring high upfront costs for RAM and storage
- Heavy researchers or video editors can still face memory pressure even with 24GB RAM
- Physical chassis/screen may be sensitive to pressure or certain third-party cases
- Incremental improvements over M2 for non-intensive tasks
Top excerpts
M4 is best if you plan to keep it for 10 years.
M4 for $850 worth it, so I think you can buy it.
M4 in some scenarios is MUCH faster.
Parent context: No. It's faster, more efficient and supports modern technologies like AV1. Reply: No. It's faster, more efficient and supports modern technologies like AV1.
Comes up as $599 for me, but for the $150 I may as well just buy the newest one with the M4