Side by side
Secureframe vs Zoom
Secureframe
10 positive (63%) · 4 mixed (25%) · 2 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +53%
Top excerpts
It’s why it’s good to have at least some kind of automated evidence collection through Secureframe or whatever, and also get every manager to be told that what you ask for from teams, you get.
Google “automations + Secureframe (or any other big compliance platform)” to see what components you can take off your plate and for how much.
A lot of teams eventually move to platforms like Vanta, Drata, or Secureframe to automate evidence collection, but they’re not a requirement to pass SOC 2.
Secureframe is solid, as well. ... If it was my business or the business of a family member, I would choose either Drata, Vanta, or Secureframe.
Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe all do roughly the same thing: they show you which checks are failing. They do not implement the controls or produce the evidence, and that is where most of the effort actually sits.
Zoom
7 positive (58%) · 3 mixed (25%) · 2 negative (17%)
Trust + time weighted: +53%
Top excerpts
Zoom works well too.
Even my old, trusty Zoom will do a nice shimmer, if you put the pitch shift algorithm to good use!
Get an audio recorder like a Zoom or Tascam.
Zoom and Google offer to integrate a phone number. For instance, Zoom is $15/m with a US phone number, unlimited calls / sms / mms, call recording, multiple devices for making and receiving calls, AI for summaries etc.
I use Zoom for simultaneous interpretation and it's great