Side by side
Rivian vs Haval
Rivian
34 positive (71%) · 9 mixed (19%) · 5 negative (10%)
Trust + time weighted: +60%
AI summary — not a quote
Rivian is widely viewed as a leading contender in the American EV market, frequently praised for its high-quality software integration and for striking a functional balance between modern technology and tactile physical controls. While owners often prefer the brand's design and visibility over competitors like Tesla, there is significant community discussion regarding the company's long-term financial stability and high cash burn rate.
Pros
- Strong software integration that is often compared favorably to Tesla and Lucid.
- Effective balance between touch-screen technology and tactile physical buttons.
- Superior visibility and design compared to some rival electric trucks.
- Successful deployment and performance in commercial fleet projects, such as delivery vans.
Cons
- Significant ongoing financial losses and high cash burn rate.
- Reports of software lag and bugs, which some users find unacceptable at the premium price point.
- Concerns regarding range and charging speeds compared to newer or upcoming models.
- Potential for rapid depreciation and tanking resale values.
Top excerpts
On a gross basis, not net. That means they've stopped losing money on every car they sell, but they're still losing money once you factor in other costs like advertising, research, warranty repairs, etc. It's an important distinction to make because Rivian still has immense cash burn, and is essentially being propped up by Amazon, Volkswagen, and the Department of Energy.
As a Rivian owner, besides steer by wire, my truck is superior in so many more ways! I have rear view visibility for starters!
It made me think that a Rivian was a good deal.
Lucid & Rivian
Rivian does this through a scoring system that rates locations based on problems and real world speed.
Haval
27 positive (73%) · 3 mixed (8%) · 7 negative (19%)
Trust + time weighted: +53%
AI summary — not a quote
Haval is frequently cited as one of the more established and reliable Chinese automotive brands, particularly within the Gulf and Australian markets. While it is praised for offering high-tech features and build quality that some users claim rivals traditional manufacturers, the brand faces significant criticism regarding its service network infrastructure and poor resale value.
Pros
- Considered one of the most reliable Chinese brands by regional owners
- High level of integrated technology and modern features for the price
- Positive long-term owner reports for specific models like the Jolion and H-9
- Large regional spare parts warehouse reported in Dubai to support maintenance
Cons
- Poor resale value compared to established Japanese or European brands
- Reports of inadequate or outdated service center facilities in some locations
- Mixed reviews on engine power and design consistency across the full vehicle lineup
- Perception by some users that the brand is still building a proven track record
Top excerpts
even in Australia where Haval etc are destroyed by the review content but receive weirdly high ratings at the end of it, presumably because they are paying the magazine.
Starray, Haval H6, H7, V7. Ford territory
Other Chinese brands are priced right for example GWM tank/Haval brands etc
Go try out haval, i feel they have good value for money cars
I was suprised that I liked V7 and H9 when I visited showroom.