Side by side
Mazda CX-5 vs Tank 500
Mazda CX-5
288 positive (71%) · 65 mixed (16%) · 53 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +62%
AI summary — not a quote
The Mazda CX-5 is a staple recommendation within automotive communities, frequently praised for its reliability, premium interior feel, and superior handling compared to rivals like the Toyota RAV4. While it is often described as a 'near-luxury' experience at a non-luxury price point, some users suggest the vehicle is overhyped, noting that while it is a solid performer, it may not deliver the 'god-tier' driving experience its reputation suggests. Common criticisms center on its relatively cramped rear seating and occasionally underwhelming highway passing power.
Pros
- Strong long-term reliability, particularly with Skyactiv engines
- Premium interior quality and features (e.g., heated steering wheel, 360 camera) that punch above its price class
- Superior handling and driving dynamics compared to many other compact SUVs
- Many units are still manufactured in Japan, which is a point of confidence for some owners
Cons
- Rear legroom and overall back seat space can feel cramped compared to competitors like the Honda CR-V or Nissan X-Trail
- Base engine performance may feel insufficient for aggressive highway passing
- Technology and infotainment features may lag behind some newer competitors
Top excerpts
Then went to test the CX5 and immediately decided to stop looking.
That’s about what a whole 2020 Mazda cx-5 is going for here.
If you need an SUV the CX-5 if you want a cross over smaller go to a CX-3. Great cars.
RAV4 is probably the worst rental SUV I’ve ever driven. The drony engine and body roll are not worth putting up for reliability sake, especially when a CX-5 exists.
Since you like Mazda look at a Mazda CX5, They are smaller, not so gigantically SUVish.
Tank 500
63 positive (73%) · 15 mixed (17%) · 8 negative (9%)
Trust + time weighted: +66%
AI summary — not a quote
The Tank 500 is frequently cited as a high-value alternative to traditional full-size SUVs like the Toyota Prado, particularly in the UAE market. Owners and reviewers highlight its premium interior, smooth 3.0L twin-turbo V6 engine, and advanced technology suite as its strongest selling points. While it offers a luxury experience at a lower price point than many competitors, it is widely criticized for its heavy fuel consumption and high insurance costs.
Pros
- Smooth and powerful 3.0L twin-turbo V6 engine with a quiet 9-speed automatic transmission
- Exceptional value-for-money with luxury features that rival more expensive brands
- High-quality interior materials, including Nappa leather and supportive 7-way adjustable seats
- Advanced technology package featuring a fast UI, consistent wireless CarPlay, and a clear 360-degree camera
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption, with multiple users reporting approximately 20L/100km
- Expensive annual insurance premiums
- The Hybrid variant is reported to feel slow compared to the V6 twin-turbo model
- Some users find the exterior styling to be outdated or less appealing than the Tank 400
Top excerpts
If hardcore offloading is not a requirement, tank 500 is better (the v6 one)
Tank 500 is cheaper but isn't as feature packed (not sure if fuel economy is good with tank cars) so he wouldn't want it.
Tank 500 would be the better serious off-roader.
Tank 500. Don’t knock it til you try it
I also feel tank-500 has more smoother drive compared to tank-300 , but it comes with extra cost , if budget permits take a look at it as well . Wonderful car