Side by side
Mazda CX-5 vs Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-5
288 positive (71%) · 65 mixed (16%) · 53 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +62%
AI summary — not a quote
The Mazda CX-5 is a staple recommendation within automotive communities, frequently praised for its reliability, premium interior feel, and superior handling compared to rivals like the Toyota RAV4. While it is often described as a 'near-luxury' experience at a non-luxury price point, some users suggest the vehicle is overhyped, noting that while it is a solid performer, it may not deliver the 'god-tier' driving experience its reputation suggests. Common criticisms center on its relatively cramped rear seating and occasionally underwhelming highway passing power.
Pros
- Strong long-term reliability, particularly with Skyactiv engines
- Premium interior quality and features (e.g., heated steering wheel, 360 camera) that punch above its price class
- Superior handling and driving dynamics compared to many other compact SUVs
- Many units are still manufactured in Japan, which is a point of confidence for some owners
Cons
- Rear legroom and overall back seat space can feel cramped compared to competitors like the Honda CR-V or Nissan X-Trail
- Base engine performance may feel insufficient for aggressive highway passing
- Technology and infotainment features may lag behind some newer competitors
Top excerpts
Then went to test the CX5 and immediately decided to stop looking.
That’s about what a whole 2020 Mazda cx-5 is going for here.
If you need an SUV the CX-5 if you want a cross over smaller go to a CX-3. Great cars.
RAV4 is probably the worst rental SUV I’ve ever driven. The drony engine and body roll are not worth putting up for reliability sake, especially when a CX-5 exists.
Since you like Mazda look at a Mazda CX5, They are smaller, not so gigantically SUVish.
Honda CR-V
195 positive (72%) · 42 mixed (15%) · 34 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +58%
AI summary — not a quote
The Honda CR-V is widely regarded by Reddit users as a benchmark for reliability and practical packaging in the compact SUV segment. It is frequently praised for its massive cargo capacity relative to its exterior footprint and its reputation for extreme longevity, with multiple users reporting trouble-free performance well beyond 175,000 miles. While it is considered a comfortable and easy-to-drive vehicle, some users find the interior styling dated and the driving experience to be more of a utilitarian 'appliance' than an engaging or fun car.
Pros
- Exceptional interior packaging and cargo space for its class.
- Proven long-term reliability with many reports of high-mileage durability.
- Strong resale value compared to most competitors.
- Easy and comfortable car-like driving dynamics.
Cons
- Interior design and materials can feel dated or basic.
- Commanding a price premium (the 'AWD tax') on the used market.
- Replacement parts can be more expensive than some rivals.
- Unexciting driving experience that prioritizes utility over 'fun'.
Top excerpts
Honda CRV drives like a car.
But when I went for a test drive, I immediately knew the CRV isn’t my thing.
CRV is great as well. My uncle’s went past 400k miles and his current one is getting high in mileage without issues.
Parent context: For 15k cash with a cat and plans to sleep in it, a rav4 is a solid call but also look at honda cr-v or element, the element especially has a huge flat floor and easy to clean interior. Reply: Did you read his post? He’s 6”1’ with a freaking cat. All of these are horrible recommendations for a live in.
look at honda cr-v or element, the element especially has a huge flat floor and easy to clean interior.