Side by side
Guinness vs Miller High Life
Guinness
54 positive (77%) · 10 mixed (14%) · 6 negative (9%)
Trust + time weighted: +68%
Top excerpts
I always include a Guinness, plus 3 local craft brewery stouts and I get the students to score the beers from 1-5, add up the scores and reveal which beer was brewed in the class.
Parent context: Most sources say Guinness but a fair amount say Heineken is the most consumed Reply: Did it include home sales? Because most Irish drink Guinness in the pub and don't rate the cans as being as good as on tap. I would definitely have thought it was Guinness in the pub.
Parent context: I was going to say in my comment that nitrogen beers like Guinness and Boddington’s are trying to replicate the mouthfeel of cask beer. As a cask beer lover it frustrates me how obsessed people get with Guinness pours and supposed difference from pub to pub, when at the end of the day it’s a mass-produced pasteurised beer that should be basically the same everywhere, compared to cask ale which changes day-to-day and is poured differently in different regions.
Within the past few years I tried stout (specifically Guinness) and then I tried some other stouts more recently.
Guinness, with its resources, is able to promise less than 0.05% abv
Miller High Life
50 positive (85%) · 8 mixed (14%) · 1 negative (2%)
Trust + time weighted: +82%
Top excerpts
Garage beer tastes like someone spilled a couple pitchers of High Life into a giant tub of seltzer
Don’t mind it, but I prefer Banquet or PBR.
I’ll gladly go down with the ship drinking PBR, High Life or Banquet before spending more money on a product that really isn’t arguably better or worse in any meaningful way.
Also in an opposite scenario, Miller High Life is only good out of a bottle
High life usually comes up as the best light macro