Side by side
GeForce Now vs Ubisoft
GeForce Now
5 positive (63%) · 2 mixed (25%) · 1 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +53%
Top excerpts
I played on GeForce now for a while and it was amazing playing cyberpunk maxed out, but screw Nvidia and their business practices.
I agree how the current market is forcing someone like me to even consider this. I absolutely used to and still hate subscription-based services like this, but unfortunately with the current prices this actually seems more cost effective.
GFN is honestly a decent service, but it’s not perfect and it’s unfortunate the market is forcing people to consider it. Having your own PC has countless benefits but if you really can’t swing it right now it’s a viable option.
I have a friend that plays 95 percent of his games on geforce now if u have decent enough internet then its not tht big of an issue there will be some latency but its not as bad as it used to be
My prediction? The ShieldTV will live-or-die based on the success of GeForce Now. They killed Gamestream a while ago (Sunshine/Moonlight is actually based on that tech), because GeForce Now started up, and Gamestream had to die because it's largely the same thing, but it's something you don't have to pay for.
Ubisoft
9 positive (25%) · 2 mixed (6%) · 25 negative (69%)
Trust + time weighted: -42%
AI summary — not a quote
Ubisoft is currently viewed with significant skepticism by the Reddit community, characterized by a predominantly negative sentiment regarding its corporate leadership and perceived anti-consumer practices. While users frequently criticize the company for its formulaic AAA titles and mandatory launcher friction, there is a distinct pocket of praise for its technical commitment to patching older games for 60FPS and its recent efforts to re-engage with the Steam ecosystem and modding community.
Pros
- Consistent 60FPS performance patches for back-catalog titles on modern consoles.
- Strong history of high-quality cross-platform ports, particularly for Nintendo hardware.
- Extensive post-launch support and long-term maintenance for released titles.
- Recent pro-consumer moves including the return of Steam achievements and providing tools to modders.
Cons
- Mandatory Ubisoft launcher causes persistent login friction and 'remember me' failures.
- Perceived lack of creative risk-taking, with a focus on high-budget formulaic games.
- History of anti-consumer practices and restrictive regional pricing.
- Corporate instability and leadership criticism, with some users speculating on potential sales or shutdowns.
Top excerpts
I think it's because Ubisoft is a horrible company.
Well, that's why I don't buy their games.
Between adding achievements to Steam games and collaborating with modders Ubisoft is sure doing a lot of pro-consumer stuff lately!
I really wish Ubisoft would go back to making more smaller budget games that dont need to sell millions to be profitable that can actually take risks.
You know what's funny? Ubisoft used to do stuff like that. I know, funny but really, ubisoft used to be a really cool fucking company 10-15 years ago with stuff like child of light, transmission, valiant hearts, blood dragon outside of the AAA fair.