Side by side
GeForce Now vs Nintendo
GeForce Now
5 positive (63%) · 2 mixed (25%) · 1 negative (13%)
Trust + time weighted: +53%
Top excerpts
I played on GeForce now for a while and it was amazing playing cyberpunk maxed out, but screw Nvidia and their business practices.
I agree how the current market is forcing someone like me to even consider this. I absolutely used to and still hate subscription-based services like this, but unfortunately with the current prices this actually seems more cost effective.
GFN is honestly a decent service, but it’s not perfect and it’s unfortunate the market is forcing people to consider it. Having your own PC has countless benefits but if you really can’t swing it right now it’s a viable option.
I have a friend that plays 95 percent of his games on geforce now if u have decent enough internet then its not tht big of an issue there will be some latency but its not as bad as it used to be
My prediction? The ShieldTV will live-or-die based on the success of GeForce Now. They killed Gamestream a while ago (Sunshine/Moonlight is actually based on that tech), because GeForce Now started up, and Gamestream had to die because it's largely the same thing, but it's something you don't have to pay for.
Nintendo
2 positive (14%) · 1 mixed (7%) · 11 negative (79%)
Trust + time weighted: -61%
Top excerpts
Nintendo still wins that prize. Last I checked EA and Ubisoft didn't backdate patents to try and destroyed a highly successful indie developer.
That's why Nintendo is still on the business of making games today. Like it or not, exclusives make a console.
For some bizzare reason Poland is considered on Steam (and Nintendo?) the riches country in the world, and has higher prices than the US or even Switzerland.
When the biggest fight was over whose turn it was on the Nintendo not who got left out of a group chat.
When the biggest fight was over whose turn it was on the Nintendo not who got left out of a group chat.