Side by side
Armored Core VI vs The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
Armored Core VI
31 positive (86%) · 4 mixed (11%) · 1 negative (3%)
Trust + time weighted: +84%
Top excerpts
It is a really good game and I can hardly wait for the AC7.
Parent context: Thanks, I have been on the fence on this one for a while. Reply: Don't be. It's incredible once it clicks. Like sekiro
This game is sublime. What happens when you mix a cocktail of the mecha genre, FromSoftware magic, and the “rule of cool” taken to the extreme? You get Armored Core 6. One of the greatest games I have ever played.
This game is sublime. What happens when you mix a cocktail of the mecha genre, FromSoftware magic, and the “rule of cool” taken to the extreme? You get Armored Core 6. One of the greatest games I have ever played.
One of the few things that I did find to be a strict downgrade though, was the Arena. It’s just too easy. Not that I’m some masochist, but it’s a problem when you fight an S rank and a C rank opponent, and you can’t tell the difference.
The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
66 positive (70%) · 17 mixed (18%) · 11 negative (12%)
Trust + time weighted: +59%
AI summary — not a quote
The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild is widely celebrated for its revolutionary approach to open-world design, emphasizing player freedom and creative traversal. While it is considered a masterpiece by many for its 'system-driven' gameplay and sense of discovery, some players find the story secondary and the price point frustratingly high for an older title.
Pros
- Exceptional traversal mechanics including climbing, gliding, and a flexible fast-travel system
- Unparalleled player freedom to tackle objectives and the final boss in any order
- Engaging system-driven gameplay that provides a solid set of rules and tools for experimentation
- Beautiful and atmospheric world design that rewards exploration
Cons
- High price point remains static years after release, even for used copies
- Soundtrack is considered less memorable by some compared to previous Zelda titles
- Storytelling is often viewed as secondary to exploration and systems
- Completionist tasks, such as collecting all Korok seeds, can feel draining
Top excerpts
Parent context: I think the big issue with open world games is just how boring traversal is. Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom did it different because you could traverse the map on different ways. Reply: I think the big issue with open world games is just how boring traversal is. Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom did it different because you could traverse the map on different ways. Easy fast travel system that can’t be triggered from anywhere instead of needing to go TO a fast travel point (like Cyberpunk, AC, etc). You can traverse on foot or by land vehicle (most if not all games do this), but you also have elevation, and a glider, which legit makes it fun.
As someone that played Tears first, it’s definitely hard to get into BoTW now lol. Tears just improves everything on an already nearly perfect game.
The last boss was a little disappointing. Too easy for a powered-up Link!
For BotW I took the overwhelmed-ness as a sign that the game might wear out its welcome, and did a sub-40 hour completion (one pro controller charge!), getting just enough hearts to get the Master Sword.
For *BotW* I took the overwhelmed-ness as a sign that the game might wear out its welcome, and did a sub-40 hour completion (one pro controller charge!), getting just enough hearts to get the Master Sword. *Breath of the Wild* was still a little too easy for me after finishing all the temples. The last boss was a little disappointing. Too easy for a powered-up Link!